In engineering, the cost of having to redo work, also known as rework, escalates dramatically as a project progresses. Late-stage changes can be exponentially more expensive than those made early in the design process. Studies indicate that engineering change orders (ECOs)—formal documents authorizing design modifications—can consume 33% to 50% of all engineering capacity and often account for 20% to 50% of total tool costs.
Early error detection is, therefore, essential when designing and building products. Siemens NX, a comprehensive software solution for product development, offers powerful tools that are designed to mitigate these risks. This article will help you understand how NX’s validation and simulation capabilities can reduce costly rework, enabling you to catch design flaws earlier and improve product quality.
Short on Time? Here's a Brief Overview
- Siemens NX's validation tools identify design flaws early in the design phase, significantly reducing expensive downstream corrections and helping engineering teams avoid rework.
- Integrated simulation in NX enables virtual testing of product designs under real-world conditions, predicting failures before physical prototypes are made, saving time and resources.
- Automated design rule checking in NX ensures adherence to standards, minimizing manual errors and enhancing the quality of product designs.
- Embedding validation and simulation throughout the design process with NX supports "first-time-right" engineering, shortening development cycles.
Understanding the Root Causes of Rework
Rework in engineering often stems from various sources. Misconfigured parameters, like incorrect dimensions or outdated master parts, are common, and overlooked design constraints or inconsistently applied design rules also frequently lead to errors requiring later changes. Plus, manual modeling errors can introduce subtle flaws difficult to detect without automation.
Poor communication of requirements is another factor. If design teams lack a clear understanding of project objectives, the resulting product designs may not meet expectations, leading to rework. And, issues during data handoff, especially when transferring CAD data to manufacturing, can also cause discrepancies. Sometimes, inconsistent standards or undocumented best practices contribute to recurring mistakes.
If not caught early, CAD anomalies like flipped surface normals (surfaces facing the wrong way) or unrealistic hole patterns can cause significant problems and delays in manufacturing processes. For instance, in plastic parts, missing draft angles (tapers on sides of a part) can prevent ejection from a mold, requiring expensive tooling modifications. Tooling for expensive manufacturing processes like injection molding can cost millions, making design errors very costly.
Leveraging NX’s Validation Tools To Prevent Errors
Siemens NX offers integrated validation tools to automate checks and enforce quality standards, helping teams avoid rework. NX helps designers identify and correct issues directly within their design environment.
Check-Mate tool
The Check-Mate tool in Siemens NX automates design rule checks, ensuring product designs comply with organizational and industry standards. It is knowledge-driven, with an extensive library of standard checks for geometry, Product Manufacturing Information (PMI), drafting, and assemblies. This tool is instrumental in identifying potential issues early in the design phase, before they become costly problems.
A key strength of Check-Mate is its custom rule authoring capability. This captures specific organizational knowledge, tailoring validation to unique requirements. When a rule is violated, Check-Mate provides instant notification to the designer, allowing immediate correction.
Validation requirements tool
Effective parameter management is another way NX helps prevent errors. NX Quick Check allows persistent monitoring of design parameters like mass and dimensions. Engineers define acceptable ranges, and the system flags out-of-range values in real time. For instance, if a component's weight exceeds limits, the designer is alerted.
While these tools warn designers, they may not always prevent out-of-range model updates, emphasizing designer responsibility. For organizations using Teamcenter (Siemens' Product Lifecycle Management software), NX Requirements Validation links product requirements to the CAD model. This ensures product designs are continuously checked against targets for performance or cost. HD3D visualization tools (high-definition 3D visual feedback) offer clear feedback on validation issues.
Utilizing NX’s Simulation Capabilities for Design Verification
Siemens NX includes built-in simulation tools for engineers to test product performance virtually under real-world conditions.
Integrated simulation and verification
NX’s simulation tools cover structural Finite Element Analysis (FEA), which simulates design reactions to forces, thermal analysis, motion/kinematics, and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) via Simcenter FLOEFD. These enable early-stage analysis of design performance.
Engineers can simulate stress distributions, thermal loads, and complex motion scenarios directly within the CAD environment, predicting potential failures like material yielding or excessive heat before physical prototypes exist.
For example, in the automotive sector, specialized vehicle validation tools within the NX ecosystem allow for detailed simulations of crashworthiness, aerodynamics, and occupant safety. Such analyses help refine product designs and significantly avoid rework by identifying issues before costly physical prototypes are built or expensive manufacturing processes begin.
These methods of simulation help design engineers make informed decisions about design changes based on performance data. Iterative virtual testing is useful for developing a digital twin (a virtual replica of a physical product or process), where the virtual model accurately predicts physical behavior. Performing such analyses early is a significant advantage.
Molded part validation
For molded parts, NX offers specialized validation. The tools address manufacturability challenges in processes like injection molding. Features include draft angle analysis, wall thickness checks, and undercut region identification (areas trapping a part in a mold). NX EasyFill simulates the injection molding fill process, predicting issues like weld lines or air traps.
These capabilities are invaluable for ensuring manufacturability for expensive manufacturing processes. Correcting issues like insufficient draft or problematic wall thicknesses virtually saves enormous costs from mold rework and scrapped parts. It reduces the need for costly physical prototypes and ensures smoother transitions into manufacturing processes.
Best Practices for Integrating Validation and Simulation in the Design Process
Effectively using Siemens NX means strategically incorporating tools and methodologies into the daily design process. Performing checks and simulations as early and continuously as possible helps. For instance, concept phases might involve simple Design for Manufacturability (DFM) checks, then, as designs progress, NX Check-Mate can apply company standards. Before release, comprehensive simulations should be run.
Regular training ensures design teams fully utilize NX’s tools, understand results, and make appropriate modifications. Standardized procedures for addressing validation warnings and simulation outcomes are also important. This could mean automated Teamcenter tasks or consistent use of HD3D visualization tools during design reviews for clear communication.
Furthermore, organizations should capture institutional knowledge—lessons from past ECOs or failures—into custom NX validation rules, turning experience into proactive checks. NX's tight CAD simulation integration facilitates quick iterations. If a check fails or simulation shows an issue, the design can be rapidly adjusted and re-evaluated, fostering continuous improvement and helping to avoid rework.
Achieving First-Time-Right Designs With NX
Consistent use of Siemens NX’s validation and simulation tools throughout the design process helps achieve "first-time-right" engineering. Benefits include reduced rework, fewer ECOs, shorter development cycles, and higher product quality. Proactively identifying design flaws, parameter issues, and manufacturability problems minimizes disruptions and late-stage expenses.
Companies shifting to simulation-driven design can achieve as much as a 20% reduction in design rework. For organizations aiming to maximize engineering value, CLEVR can assist in integrating these powerful tools into daily workflows, helping to reduce rework, accelerate time-to-market, and boost first-time-right design performance.
Research Methodology
This article is based on information gathered from Siemens NX product documentation, analyses from industry experts, technical papers, and real-world examples of companies benefiting from the application of advanced validation and simulation tools.
Sources include CLEVR's own expertise and content related to Siemens solutions, plus insights from reputable industry analysts and technical resources detailing the capabilities and impact of NX software in reducing rework and improving engineering outcomes.
Find out how CLEVR can drive impact for your business
FAQ
Can't find the answer to your question? Just get in touch
How early in the design process can NX validation tools be used?
NX validation can start from the initial concept phase. Basic checks can be applied to sketches, with more comprehensive rule and parameter validation, like Check-Mate, integrated throughout the detailed design phase.
Can custom validation rules be created in NX Check-Mate for specific company standards?
Yes, NX Check-Mate allows companies to author custom rules. This enables them to capture their unique industry knowledge and internal best practices to automate compliance checks effectively within their design teams.
Do NX simulation tools replace the need for physical prototypes entirely?
While NX simulation significantly reduces reliance on physical prototypes by catching many issues virtually, targeted physical testing often remains valuable for final verification, especially in complex or safety-critical scenarios.
